|
Encouraging
Extensive Reading
by Scott Shelton
- 1
What
is it and why do it?
Reading
extensively means reading widely and in quantity. It means
reading large amounts (often of what we find intrinsically
interesting) with the main aim of getting a global understanding
of what you are reading. Palmer makes the distinction between
intensive reading (1968:137) which often refers to careful
reading and possibly translation of shorter, more difficult
foreign language texts with the ultimate goal of complete
and detailed understanding. It is often the case that intensive
reading is the only kind of reading that students do in the
language classroom. As Dupy, Tse and Cook explain,
"
for the most part, students have only been exposed to intensive
reading of short excerpts or passages in their ESL classes
and tend to believe that this is the only way to read in a
second language." (1996:10)
This
may be because it is largely associated with teaching reading
(and other) skills and for the purpose of disassembling text
for later detailed scrutiny. This is often a slow, difficult,
painstaking process which is more focused on the meaning of
individual words or sentences containing whatever discrete
grammar point the students are supposed to be learning that
day. Many students consequently associate reading in English
with this approach and are therefore (understandably) reluctant
to engage in reading outside of class.
Brian
Seaton (1982:150) suggests that extensive reading may begin
with short illustrated anecdotes, and on to short stories
written in graded language that the learner can be expected
to understand without great difficulty. Extensive reading
presupposes that the learner reads the text without difficulty
and if possible for pleasure.
In
a recent survey conducted by the students themselves in one
of my classes on the subject of reading, (appendix 1) several
people reported they liked reading in English 'what they could
read fluently and without having to use a dictionary every
three words.' Helgesen, M (1997) backs this up by suggesting
that an average of three or four unknown words per page, or
less, means a book can be read fluently. Dictionaries should
not normally be consulted as this disturbs fluent reading.
The
majority of the students surveyed said that they read in English
mostly at work via e-mail and web-sites as part of their duties
as well as newspapers and literature that had something to
do with their job. They all agreed that reading in English
could help them learn vocabulary and grammatical structures.
By
reading extensively, these learners recognize that they can
improve their vocabulary and comprehension, and also recognize
the need to read something they can easily understand and
have an interest in. Ronan Brown (2000) insists that the more
learners read, the more skilful and fluent they become. He
argues that the bottom-up process of instantaneous word recognition,
upon which true comprehension depends, is the result of practice.
Thus,
by engaging in reading extensively in what the learner is
interested in, utilizing a top-down process, where the reader
brings in outside knowledge and interest and is reading for
global understanding, the development of a large sight vocabulary
is exercised and automaticity of decoding is spurred on. This
is of course only true if what is being read is largely understandable
to the reader to begin with. If the small amount of learning
of a word is not soon after reinforced by another encounter,
then that learning will be lost (Nation, 1997). In an article
on teaching vocabulary, Sokemen (1997) mentions that throughout
the literature, certain pedagogical themes emerge:
"build
a large sight vocabulary, integrate new words with the old,
provide a number of encounters with words, promote a deep
level of processing, facilitate imaging and correctness and
encourage independent learner strategies."
It sounds as if she were referring to the benefits of extensive
reading for language learners.
As
Brown points out (2000), familiarity leads to automaticity
Automaticity to speed and fluency. Krashen also argues in
his 1994 book, the power of reading, that extensive reading
leads to language acquisition, provided that there is adequate
exposure to the language, interesting material and a relaxed
and tension free environment. The results of two studies linking
reading for pleasure and language acquisition (Schackne 1986)
resulted in this conclusion:
"There
is evidence that extensive reading promotes language level
increase within a short period of time as measured by cloze."
There
seems to be no shortage of experts and literature extolling
the inherent power and purpose of extensive reading, there
seem to be no lack of reasons why we, as teachers, should
not be encouraging our students to do this. How is it to be
done?
To
page 2 of 4
To
the lesson plan
Back
to the articles index
|