|
Motivation
and motivating in the foreign language classroom
by Dimitrios Thanasoulas
- 4
Encouraging
positive self-evaluation
Research
has shown that the way learners feel about their accomplishments
and the amount of satisfaction they experience after task
completion will determine how teachers approach and tackle
subsequent learning tasks. By employing appropriate strategies,
the latter can help learners to evaluate themselves in a positive
light, encouraging them to take credit for their advances.
Dornyei (2001: 134) presents three areas of such strategies:
Promoting attributions to effort rather than to ability
Providing motivational feedback
Increasing learner satisfaction and the question of
rewards and grades.
We
will only briefly discuss the third one.
Increasing
learner satisfaction and the question of rewards and grades
The
feeling of satisfaction is a significant factor in reinforcing
achievement behaviour, which renders satisfaction a major
component of motivation. Motivational strategies aimed at
increasing learner satisfaction usually focus on allowing
students to display their work, encouraging them to be proud
of themselves and celebrate success, as well as using rewards.
The latter, though, do not work properly within a system where
grades are 'the ultimate embodiment of school rewards, providing
a single index for judging overall success and failure in
school' (ibid.). In other words, grades focus on performance
outcomes, rather than on the process of learning itself. Consequently,
'many students are grade driven, not to say, "grade grubbing,"
and this preoccupation begins surprisingly early in life'
(Covington, 1999: 127).
There is also a wide assortment of macrostrategies used to
foster motivation, but we will not dwell on them (see Dornyei,
2001: 137-140 for more details).
Conclusion
In
general, motivation is the 'neglected heart' of our understanding
of how to design instruction (Keller, 1983, quoted in Dornyei,
2001: 116). Many teachers believe that by sticking to the
language materials and trying to discipline their refractory
students, they will manage to create a classroom environment
that will be conducive to learning. Nevertheless, these teachers
seem to lose sight of the fact that, unless they accept their
students' personalities and work on those minute details that
constitute their social and psychological make-up, they will
fail to motivate them. What is more, they will not be able
to form a cohesive and coherent group, unless they succeed
in turning most "curriculum goals" (goals set by
outsiders) into "group goals" (goals accepted by
the group members, that is, students). Learning a foreign
language is different to learning other subjects. Therefore,
language teaching should take account of a variety of factors
that are likely to promote, or even militate against, success.
Language is part of one's identity and is used to convey this
identity to others. As a result, foreign language learning
has a significant impact on the social being of the learner,
since it involves the adoption of new social and cultural
behaviours and ways of thinking.
REFERENCES
Alison,
J. 1993. Not bothered? Motivating reluctant language learners
in KeyStage 4: London: CILT.
Argyle, M. 1969. Social Interaction. London: Tavistock Press.
Benson, P. 2000. Teaching and researching autonomy in language
learning. London: Longman.
Chambers, G. N. 1999. Motivating language learners. Clevedon:
Multilingua Matters.
Covington, M. 1999. Caring about learning: The nature and
nurturing of subject-matter appreciation. Educational Psychologist,
34: 127-36.
Daniels, R. 1994. Motivational mediators of cooperative learning.
Psychological Reports, 74: 1011-22.
Dornyei, Z. and Otto, I. 1998. Motivation in action: A process
model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics
(London: Thames Valley University), 4: 43-69.
Dornyei, Z. 2001. Teaching and Researching Motivation. England:
Pearson Education Limited.
Ehrman, M. E. and Dornyei, Z. 1998. Interpersonal dynamics
in second language Education: The visible and invisible classroom.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Good, T. L. and Brophy, J. E. 1994. Looking in classrooms.
6th edition. New York: HarperCollins.
Little, D. 1991. Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and
problems. Dublin: Authentik.
MacIntyre, P. D. 1999. Language anxiety: A review of the research
for language
Teachers. In Young, D. J. (ed.). Affect in foreign language
and second language learning. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, pp.
24-45.
Rogers, C. 1991. On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton
Mifflin.
Ushioda, E. 1997. The role of motivational thinking in autonomous
language
Learning. In Little, D. and Voss, B. (Eds.). Language centres:
Planning for the new millennium. Plymouth: University of Plymouth,
CERCLES, Centre for Modern Languages, pp. 39-50.
Wenden, A. 1991. Learner strategies for learner autonomy.
Hemel Hempstead:
Biodata
|
Dimitrios
Thanasoulas studied
English Literature and Linguistics at Athens University
and then did an MA in Applied Linguistics at Sussex
University. After that, he earned an MBA from Mooreland
University and is currently finishing the second year
of my PhD studies in Education at Nottingham University.
His academic interests include fostering cultural awareness
and learner autonomy, as well as such issues as language
and ideology, Critical Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics,
Sociolinguistics, and the Psychology of Education.
|

Dimitrios
can be contacted at:
akasa74@hotmail.com
|
To
the beginning of the article
Back
to the articles index
|